Academic appeals
Assess the published appeal grounds and the reasons given for the decision. A strong response identifies the specific issue with the process or evidence.
An assessment or progression decision can change the direction of your studies. We examine the reasons, the relevant regulations and the evidence before identifying a focused response.
Every case turns on its own facts. These are some of the issues we can help you assess and address.
Assess the published appeal grounds and the reasons given for the decision. A strong response identifies the specific issue with the process or evidence.
Examine whether the assessment procedure, marking process or published rules were followed. Disagreement with academic judgment alone is usually a different matter.
Review how illness, disability or other circumstances were raised, evidenced and considered under the university’s procedure.
Address decisions about resits, repeat years, withdrawal or an award where the rules or relevant information may not have been properly applied.
These situations can become difficult quickly. An early review helps separate the immediate problem from the wider consequences.
You believe an assessment error or procedural irregularity affected the outcome.
You supplied evidence about circumstances affecting your work, but the decision gives no clear account of how it was considered.
A resit, repeat-year or withdrawal decision puts the next stage of study at risk.
We review the decision, the assessment record and the relevant regulations. The aim is to separate a properly arguable ground from a general disagreement with the result.
The appropriate route depends on the decision and the stage already reached.
Confirm the exact outcome, the decision-maker and the applicable appeal route.
Compare the university’s reasons with its rules and the evidence available.
Set out the relevant ground, supporting material and the remedy sought clearly.
The answer depends on the facts, the documents and the procedure that applies to you.
Academic judgment is generally treated differently from a procedural error, bias or missed evidence. The decision and regulations need to be examined before choosing a route.
Send the decision and deadline promptly. Any extension or late appeal depends on the institution’s procedure and the facts.
Tell us what happened, share the decision and any approaching deadline. Choose a meeting, WhatsApp or email on our contact page.
Book a meeting or contact usBackground reading: OIA guidance on complaints and academic appeals